| Product | Ideal for | Price from | Free version | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enterprise AI visibility programmes | $99 per month | No | Visit | |
| Prompt-level analytics for agencies | $95 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Budget AI search monitoring | $29 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Monitoring plus AI-optimised site delivery | $250 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| AEO command centre for larger teams | $295 per month | Yes | Visit | |
| AI visibility plus content optimisation | $99 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| AI visibility inside an SEO suite | $99 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Answer-ready content optimisation | $99 per month | Free trial | Visit |
We compared official feature pages, pricing pages, app store listings, privacy policies and public reviews to build this list for best aeo tools. Every option below exists and works today, and each one earns its place for a different kind of reader.

Ideal for: Enterprise AI visibility programmes

Here is the short version. Profound suits enterprise teams that need deep AI visibility data and a dedicated operator to act on it. It fits readers who want enterprise ai visibility programmes, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $99 per month, with a free plan status of no. The Starter limits matter, so check which engines your plan covers before comparing prices. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: Prompt-level analytics for agencies

Start here if you want the safe default. Peec AI suits agencies that need prompt-level analytics across clients, with clear visibility and citation data. It fits readers who want prompt-level analytics for agencies, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $95 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. Engine coverage varies by plan, so confirm your key engines are included before you buy. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: Budget AI search monitoring

This one suits a specific kind of reader. Otterly AI is the budget entry, with daily tracking at a price small teams can justify. It fits readers who want budget ai search monitoring, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $29 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. Add-on engines raise the bill, so price your full engine list, not just the Lite headline. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: Monitoring plus AI-optimised site delivery
Consider this if the top picks do not fit. Scrunch suits teams that want monitoring plus a machine-readable site for AI crawlers. It fits readers who want monitoring plus ai-optimised site delivery, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $250 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. The price puts it out of reach for solo marketers, so smaller teams should start with Otterly or Peec. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: AEO command centre for larger teams
A strong option for a narrower need. AthenaHQ suits larger teams that want a command centre with citation checks and optimisation actions. It fits readers who want aeo command centre for larger teams, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $295 per month, with a free plan status of yes. The price and complexity suit teams with a dedicated SEO owner, not casual users. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: AI visibility plus content optimisation
Worth a close look before you decide. Writesonic suits teams that want tracking plus the content work to improve it, in one platform. It fits readers who want ai visibility plus content optimisation, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $99 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. If you only need tracking, a pure monitor may be cheaper, so compare on the workflow you actually use. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.

Ideal for: AI visibility inside an SEO suite
This belongs on the shortlist for a reason. SE Visible suits teams already using SE Ranking, adding AI visibility without a second vendor. It fits readers who want ai visibility inside an seo suite, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $99 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. Per-domain pricing adds up for agencies with many clients, so check the multi-domain bill. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.
Ideal for: Answer-ready content optimisation
Do not overlook this one. Surfer suits content teams that optimise articles for both search and AI answers. It fits readers who want answer-ready content optimisation, and its published feature set matches that promise rather than trying to cover every possible use case at once. When we weighed it against the rest of this list, the balance of price, scope and support stood out for that group. The price picture is $99 per month, with a free plan status of free trial. Pure tracking buyers may prefer a dedicated monitor, but content teams gain from the combined workflow. Before you sign up, check the current plan limits on the official site, because caps on users, usage or features are where most buyers get surprised after the first month.
We started from official feature pages and pricing pages, then checked app store listings, privacy policies and public reviews to confirm each product still works and still fits the topic. Products that could not be verified, or that only partly matched the topic, were left out, even when they were well known. We favoured a mix of established leaders and strong smaller options, and we weighted price transparency, a usable free tier or trial, and honest limits more heavily than marketing claims. No product on this list paid for its place, and our pick for most people is the one we would suggest to a friend with ordinary needs and an ordinary budget.
Start with the engines that matter to your buyers, because a tool that tracks ChatGPT only is not comparable with one that tracks eight engines. Next, check the billing unit: per brand, per domain, per prompt or per check all produce different bills, and the cheapest headline can cost twice as much once you track five engines. Then check data method, because real user prompts, clickstream data, scraped chat interfaces and crawler logs measure different things and disagree. Finally, check whether the tool only measures or also helps you fix visibility, since most tools report the problem and leave the content work to you. Also lock your prompt set before you start, because changing prompts mid-quarter breaks trend lines. Trial two tools on the same prompts for a month and compare the numbers side by side, then keep the one whose data your team trusts and acts on. The best AEO tool is the one that turns a visibility gap into a concrete content change.
Profound leads for enterprise depth, Peec AI leads for agencies, Otterly AI leads on budget, and Scrunch AI leads for monitoring plus crawler delivery. Writesonic and SE Ranking suit teams that want tracking inside a broader suite.
Answer Engine Optimization, also called GEO, is the practice of earning citations and mentions in AI-generated answers from ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity and Google AI Overviews. AEO tools track whether AI systems cite your brand.
Entry prices run from 29 dollars a month for Otterly AI to about 99 dollars for Profound, Peec AI and Writesonic, and 250 dollars or more for Scrunch AI. Engine coverage and prompt limits change the real price.
Most tools only measure, telling you where you are absent and who is cited instead. The fixing work, such as quotable pages, structured data and third-party authority, still falls to your team.
Mostly, AEO and GEO describe the same practice, but they differ from classic SEO: SEO tracks rankings on results pages, while AEO tracks citations inside AI answers. A page can rank first and still never appear in an AI answer.