| Product | Ideal for | Price from | Free version | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-cost AI visibility tracking | $29 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Enterprise visibility intelligence | $99 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Agency reporting across engines | See website | Free trial | Visit | |
| Existing Semrush users | See website | Free trial | Visit | |
| Citation source research | See website | No | Visit | |
| Crawler and prompt data combined | $250 per month | No | Visit | |
| Revenue-linked AI visibility reporting | Free | Yes | Visit |
Google AI Mode changes how people find answers, because a single AI response can replace a page of blue links. The tools below track how your brand shows up in AI answers, which sources get cited, and how that picture changes over time. We compared official feature pages, pricing pages, public reviews and documentation for each tool.

Ideal for: Low-cost AI visibility tracking
Otterly AI is the easiest starting point in this list for a small team that wants to watch AI answers without an enterprise budget. It tracks brand mentions across chatbots and AI search features, and it groups results by client or brand so an agency can keep accounts separate. Setup is quick, and the dashboard keeps the focus on mentions, citations and changes over time rather than a long list of settings.
The catch is the add-on structure. If Google AI Mode tracking is the main reason you are buying, confirm which plan includes it and what it costs, because it is not part of every base tier. Prompt limits also rise in price as you scale, so a team tracking many topics should price the plan they will need in six months, not just the plan they need today.

Ideal for: Enterprise visibility intelligence

Profound is built for larger companies where AI search visibility affects revenue and where someone will read the data every day. It tracks brand mentions, citations and sentiment across major engines, and it adds prompt demand data that helps teams see which questions people actually ask. For an enterprise team, that depth is the main reason to pay more.
Smaller teams should read the Starter plan carefully. It covers fewer engines and prompts than the Growth tier, so the headline price is not the price of full coverage. If you only need to watch one engine for one brand, it can still work, but most teams comparing full AI Mode coverage will be looking at the higher tier.

Ideal for: Agency reporting across engines

Peec AI suits agencies and funded teams that need clean reporting across several AI engines. It distinguishes between being retrieved as a source and actually being cited in an answer, which is a useful distinction when a client asks why traffic did not follow a rising visibility score. Multi-country reporting and reporting connectors help teams that serve clients in more than one market.
The trade-off is complexity at the low end. Entry plans do not include every engine, and agency plans are priced differently, so the quote you get depends on how many brands and engines you track. Ask for that quote in writing before you commit, and check how often prompts refresh on your plan.

Ideal for: Existing Semrush users
Semrush is the practical pick if your team already lives in Semrush for keyword research, site audits and rank tracking. The AI Visibility Toolkit adds AI search tracking to that workflow, so you can compare classic rankings and AI citations in one place instead of juggling two tools. It also surfaces the real questions behind AI answers, which helps content teams decide what to write next.
As a standalone purchase it is harder to justify. The toolkit is priced as an add-on, so the total cost includes the base Semrush plan. Teams that do not use the rest of the suite will usually get better value from a dedicated tracker such as Otterly AI or Peec AI.

Ideal for: Citation source research
Ahrefs Brand Radar appeals to SEO teams that care most about which pages get cited and why. Ahrefs has long been strong on link data, and that strength carries into AI visibility work, where the cited source URL often matters more than a brand mention count. If your job is to earn citations from strong pages, this is a natural fit.
The pricing structure needs care. Brand Radar is an add-on to an Ahrefs plan, and covering every platform costs more than covering one. Teams that only need a simple AI mention count will find cheaper options elsewhere, but teams that already pay for Ahrefs and want source-level detail will find it a logical extension.

Ideal for: Crawler and prompt data combined
Scrunch AI takes a different angle from most trackers in this list. Alongside prompt tracking, it looks at how AI crawlers actually visit and read your site, which helps technical teams find pages that AI systems misread or miss. That combination suits companies where the site itself, not just the content plan, needs fixing.
The entry price puts it out of reach for a solo blogger, and the data only pays off if someone fixes what it finds. For a mid-size company or agency with a technical SEO owner, though, the combined view can save time compared with buying a tracker and a crawler tool separately.

Ideal for: Revenue-linked AI visibility reporting
AthenaHQ is worth a look for agencies that need to connect AI visibility to business results. It links AI mention data with analytics and commerce data, so a report can show more than a rising score: it can show what happened to traffic and sales in the same period. A free Essential tier makes it easy to test the workflow before paying.
Credit-based pricing is the thing to watch. Each AI response costs credits, so a team tracking many prompts can burn through an allowance faster than expected. Start on the free tier, measure your real monthly usage, and only then move to a paid plan sized to that usage.
We compared official feature pages, pricing pages, app and platform documentation, and public reviews for tools that track Google AI Mode and other AI search engines. We favored tools with published pricing or a clear free tier or trial, real engine coverage rather than vague claims, and a current product in October 2026. We left out tools we could not verify as live products with a working official homepage.
Start with engine coverage, not the headline score. Make a list of the engines your customers actually use, including Google AI Mode, ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini, and check each tool against that list on the plan you would buy. A tool that covers four engines on its homepage but only one on its cheapest plan is a different product from the one advertised.
Prompt limits decide how many questions a tool checks for you, and refresh rates decide how often it checks them. A weekly refresh can miss a fast-moving news cycle, while daily checks cost more. Match the refresh rate to how often your content changes, and size the prompt allowance for the topics you will track in three months, not just the ones you track today.
A mention count alone does not tell you what to fix. Look for tools that show the cited source URL, the exact prompt, and the competing sources that won the citation. That detail turns a report into a work plan: update a page, add a fact, or earn a link from a stronger source. Tools that only show a score will leave your content team guessing.
AI search tools change pricing and plan limits often. Favor month-to-month billing while you test, keep a note of what your plan includes, and re-check pricing before renewal. If a vendor gates AI Mode behind an add-on, get the combined monthly cost in writing so the budget you approve matches the bill you receive.
It is a tool that tracks how your brand, products and pages appear in AI-generated answers, including Google AI Mode. It reports mentions, citations and the sources those answers rely on, so you can see where you are visible and where competitors are cited instead.
Not always. Both suites now offer AI visibility add-ons that suit teams already paying for them. A separate dedicated tracker usually makes sense when you want lower costs, agency workspaces, or deeper AI-only reporting that a general SEO suite does not provide.
Rank tracking measures your position in a list of links for a keyword. AI Mode tracking measures whether an AI answer mentions or cites you, which source it cites, and how that answer changes over time. The two overlap, but they answer different questions.
No tool can guarantee a citation. What they do is show which prompts mention you, which sources win, and which pages need work. The improvement comes from the content and technical fixes you make based on that data, not from the dashboard itself.
Start with 20 to 50 prompts that reflect real customer questions, including product comparisons, pricing questions and problem-solving queries. Add prompts only when you have someone to act on the results, since unused prompts are wasted budget.