| Product | Ideal for | Price from | Free version | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low-cost LLM visibility tracking | $29 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Enterprise LLM visibility | $99 per month | Free trial | Visit | |
| Agency LLM reporting | See website | Free trial | Visit | |
| Semrush users | See website | Free trial | Visit | |
| Citation source data | See website | No | Visit | |
| LLM plus crawler data | $250 per month | No | Visit | |
| Revenue-linked LLM reporting | Free | Yes | Visit |
LLM SEO, also called generative engine optimization, means making your brand and content visible in answers from ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews. The tools below track mentions, citations and sentiment across those models, and show which sources win. We compared official feature pages, pricing pages and public reviews.

Ideal for: Low-cost LLM visibility tracking
Otterly AI is our pick for a small team starting LLM SEO. It tracks brand mentions across major AI engines, groups results by client or brand for agencies, and keeps setup simple. The entry price of $29 per month is the lowest in this list, making it easy to test LLM tracking before committing to an enterprise tool.
Some models cost extra as add-ons, and core plans refresh weekly rather than daily, so confirm model coverage and refresh rate on your plan. For a focused set of prompts and brands, Otterly AI gives a clear, affordable view of LLM visibility.

Ideal for: Enterprise LLM visibility

Profound suits a larger company where LLM visibility affects revenue and where an analyst will work the data daily. It tracks mentions, citations and sentiment across major models, adds prompt demand data showing which questions people ask, and offers content tools on some plans. That depth helps a team prioritize content that earns citations.
Starter covers fewer models and prompts than Growth, so budget for the Growth tier if you need full coverage. For an enterprise LLM program, Profound's data depth is the benchmark, even at a higher price.

Ideal for: Agency LLM reporting

Peec AI suits agencies reporting LLM visibility across clients. It separates retrieval from citation, so a client can see whether their pages are found as sources versus actually cited in answers. Multi-country reporting and connectors help agencies that serve clients in several markets.
Entry plans cover fewer models, so confirm the models you need are included. Agency pricing differs from brand pricing, so get a written quote for your brand and model count before committing.

Ideal for: Semrush users
Semrush is the practical pick for a team already using Semrush. The AI Visibility Toolkit adds LLM and AI search tracking to keyword research, audits and rank tracking, so one login covers classic and LLM visibility. Prompt insights reveal the real questions behind AI answers, guiding content work.
As a standalone LLM tool it is expensive, since the toolkit is an add-on to a base Semrush plan. Teams that do not use the rest of Semrush should choose a dedicated tracker such as Otterly AI or Peec AI.

Ideal for: Citation source data
Ahrefs Brand Radar appeals to SEO teams focused on which pages get cited by LLMs and why. Link data and content data help explain citation wins, and the tool tracks AI mentions alongside web mentions in a familiar Ahrefs interface. For a team whose job is earning citations from authoritative pages, that source detail is valuable.
It is an add-on to an Ahrefs plan, and covering every platform costs more than one. Teams that only need a mention count will find cheaper tools, but Ahrefs users who want source-level LLM data will find Brand Radar a logical extension.

Ideal for: LLM plus crawler data
Scrunch AI pairs LLM answer tracking with data on how AI crawlers actually visit and read your site. That combination helps technical teams find pages that models misread, block or miss, which prompt data alone cannot show. Paid plans include all models without surcharges, and agency workspaces support multi-brand work.
The $250 per month entry price is beyond a solo blogger, and the crawler data needs someone to fix what it finds. For a mid-size company with technical SEO ownership, Scrunch offers a combined view that two separate tools would cost more to replicate.

Ideal for: Revenue-linked LLM reporting
AthenaHQ suits agencies that need to tie LLM visibility to business results. It links mention data with analytics and commerce data, so reports can show traffic and sales alongside visibility scores. A free Essential tier lets a team test the workflow before paying, and Starter tracks several models.
Credit pricing means each AI response costs credits, so heavy prompt tracking can use an allowance faster than expected. Measure real monthly usage on the free tier first, then size a paid plan to that usage.
We compared official feature pages, pricing pages and public reviews for LLM SEO tools available in October 2026. We favored tools with real LLM model coverage, published pricing or a free tier, and a working official homepage. We left out tools we could not verify as live products.
List the models your customers use, including ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, Claude and Google AI Overviews, and check each tool against that list on the plan you would buy. A tool that advertises many models but includes few on its cheapest plan is a different product from the one on its homepage.
LLM visibility improves when content is clear, factual, well-structured and cited by authoritative sources. Use tool data to find prompts where competitors win, then improve the page: add facts, structure, examples and sources. A rising score without content fixes usually means the model changed, not that your site improved.
Most tools in this list offer a free tier or a trial, and the smartest use of that trial is a small, realistic test rather than a tour of every feature. Pick one real job, such as a single project, a single campaign, or a single workflow your team runs every week, and run it end to end in the trial. Invite the people who will actually use the tool daily, not just the person choosing it, and ask them to complete that job without help. Note where they get stuck, how long the job takes compared with your current method, and whether the result is good enough to share with a client or a manager. Check support response times during the trial too, since a fast answer during a trial often predicts the help you will get later. At the end of the trial, compare the real time saved and the real cost per user against the plan you would buy, and only then decide whether the upgrade is worth it for your team.
The free tier or trial for most apps in this list is enough to judge whether the app fits your routine, but only if you use it for a full week rather than an afternoon. Set it up properly on day one, including notifications, reminders, and any import from your current app, so the trial reflects real use instead of a half-finished setup. Use it at the same times you would normally use such an app, and note what annoys you by day three, since small annoyances grow into reasons to quit. Check whether your data exports cleanly, whether the app works offline when you need it, and whether support answers a real question promptly. If the app still earns its place after a week of honest use, the paid plan is an easy decision, and if it does not, you have saved a subscription you would have cancelled later.
It is a tool that tracks how your brand and pages appear in answers from large language models such as ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude, including mentions, citations and sentiment, so you can improve visibility in AI search.
Classic SEO targets rankings in a list of links. LLM SEO targets mentions and citations inside a single AI-generated answer, where only a few sources are cited and the answer itself may satisfy the user without a click.
Track the models your customers actually use, typically ChatGPT and Google AI Overviews first, plus Perplexity, Gemini and Claude where relevant. Check each tool's model coverage on your plan, since add-ons vary.
No. Tools show where you are cited and where competitors win, but citations depend on content quality, authority and relevance. Use the data to guide content and technical fixes, not as a guarantee.
Entry prices range from free tiers at AthenaHQ and ZipTie to $29 per month at Otterly AI, $99 at Profound Starter, and $250 at Scrunch. Enterprise coverage costs more, so price the plan that includes your models and prompt volume.