Best OKR Software in 2026: 8 Tools Compared

A
By the Ainotely Editorial Team.
Updated October 2026. 9 min read. Prices and features researched from each vendor's official pages and app store listings at time of writing.
Best OKR Software
Quick picks
  1. 1Lattice logo
    LatticeGoals with performance tools
    Visit
  2. 2Betterworks logo
    BetterworksEnterprise OKR and performance
    Visit
  3. 3Weekdone logo
    WeekdoneSimple team OKR tracking
    Visit
  4. 4Perdoo logo
    PerdooOKR with strategy maps
    Visit
  5. 5Quantive logo
    QuantiveOKR analytics for larger teams
    Visit
Short version:
In this guide Quick comparisonThe best okr softwareHow we picked theseMaking OKRs work in practiceFrequently asked questionsSources

Quick comparison

ProductIdeal forPrice fromFree version
LatticeGoals with performance toolsSee websiteFree trialVisit
BetterworksEnterprise OKR and performanceSee websiteFree trialVisit
WeekdoneSimple team OKR trackingSee websiteFree trialVisit
PerdooOKR with strategy mapsSee websiteFree trialVisit
QuantiveOKR analytics for larger teamsSee websiteFree trialVisit
Profit.coOKR with task managementSee websiteFree trialVisit
MooncampModern simple OKRsSee websiteFree trialVisit
Viva GoalsOKRs inside Microsoft 365See websiteFree trialVisit

The best okr software

We compared OKR software on goal setting, alignment views, check-ins, integrations and reporting. The best tool is the one teams actually update, so ease of check-ins mattered as much as analytics depth. Our pick for most teams is Lattice for its balanced HR and goals mix, with Weekdone as the simpler alternative.

Lattice logo
#1

Lattice

Ideal for: Goals with performance tools

Lattice website
lattice.com homepage

Lattice combines OKRs with performance reviews and engagement tools, giving HR teams one place for goals and growth. That combination suits mid-size companies building a performance culture. Pricing scales with users, and the full suite may exceed what a small team needs for OKRs alone.

For most readers, the deciding question with Lattice is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKRs plus performance reviews
  • Engagement tools
  • Reporting
  • Pricing scales
  • Full suite may be more than small teams need
Betterworks logo
#2

Betterworks

Ideal for: Enterprise OKR and performance

Betterworks website
betterworks.com homepage

Betterworks offers OKR tracking with performance management and analytics for larger organisations. That depth suits enterprises running formal goal cycles. Pricing targets larger teams and setup takes time, so smaller teams may prefer Weekdone or Mooncamp.

For most readers, the deciding question with Betterworks is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKR tracking
  • Performance management
  • Analytics
  • Enterprise pricing
  • Setup takes time
Weekdone logo
#3

Weekdone

Ideal for: Simple team OKR tracking

Weekdone website
weekdone.com homepage

Weekdone keeps OKR tracking simple, with weekly check-ins and reporting that small and mid-size teams can adopt quickly. That simplicity is its strength. Feature depth is less than Lattice or Betterworks, and the free tier limits users, so larger organisations may outgrow it.

For most readers, the deciding question with Weekdone is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • Simple OKR tracking
  • Weekly check-ins
  • Reporting
  • Feature depth less than enterprise tools
  • Free tier limits
Perdoo logo
#4

Perdoo

Ideal for: OKR with strategy maps

Perdoo pairs OKR tracking with strategy maps that show how team goals connect to company strategy. That visual alignment helps leadership communicate priorities. Pricing scales with users, and the interface takes learning, but the strategy view is valuable for growing companies.

For most readers, the deciding question with Perdoo is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKR tracking
  • Strategy maps
  • Integrations
  • Pricing scales
  • Interface takes learning
Quantive logo
#5

Quantive

Ideal for: OKR analytics for larger teams

Quantive, formerly Gtmhub, offers OKR tracking with analytics and integrations for larger teams. That analytics depth suits organisations managing many goals across departments. Pricing targets larger teams and setup takes time, so small teams should trial simpler tools first.

For most readers, the deciding question with Quantive is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKR tracking
  • Analytics
  • Integrations
  • Pricing targets larger teams
  • Setup takes time
Profit.co logo
#6

Profit.co

Ideal for: OKR with task management

Profit.co combines OKR tracking with task management and performance tools, letting teams connect daily work to goals. That connection helps execution. The interface feels dense to newcomers, and pricing scales with users, so trial it with a real team before committing.

For most readers, the deciding question with Profit.co is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKR tracking
  • Task management
  • Performance tools
  • Interface is dense
  • Pricing scales
Mooncamp logo
#7

Mooncamp

Ideal for: Modern simple OKRs

Mooncamp offers a modern, simple OKR interface with check-ins and integrations, popular with startups and scale-ups. That modern feel speeds adoption. The ecosystem is smaller than Lattice, and feature depth is moderate, but for focused OKR tracking it works well.

For most readers, the deciding question with Mooncamp is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • Modern OKR interface
  • Check-ins
  • Integrations
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Feature depth moderate
Viva Goals logo
#8

Viva Goals

Ideal for: OKRs inside Microsoft 365

Microsoft Viva Goals, formerly Ally.io, brings OKR tracking inside Microsoft 365 with Teams integration. That integration suits organisations already running Microsoft tools. It needs a Microsoft 365 plan that includes Viva Goals, and availability varies, so check your licence before planning a rollout.

For most readers, the deciding question with Viva Goals is fit rather than raw feature count. Check the plan limits that matter to you, such as seats, usage caps and what happens when a trial ends, before you commit to a paid tier. If the free tier or trial covers your core task, use it for a full week of real work before paying, and keep an eye on renewal terms and cancellation steps. That short test usually tells you more than any feature list, and it keeps the choice grounded in how you actually work day to day.

The good and the bad
  • OKR tracking inside Microsoft Viva
  • Teams integration
  • Reporting
  • Needs Microsoft 365
  • Availability varies by plan

How we picked these

We compared official feature pages, pricing pages, app store listings, privacy policies and public reviews for each option below. We kept only products that exist and work now, that fit the topic directly, and whose official homepage we could confirm. Where a price was not published clearly, we wrote See website rather than guessing, and we favoured options with a free tier or trial where one exists.

Making OKRs work in practice

Set fewer goals, and review them weekly. Teams that set ten objectives per quarter achieve none well, while teams with three clear objectives and weekly check-ins make steady progress. The tool should make weekly updates easy, or updates will stop.

Connect team goals to company goals visibly. Alignment views help, but only if leaders actually discuss them. Review alignment in quarterly planning, not just in the tool, so teams see how their work matters.

Grade honestly at quarter end. OKRs are meant to stretch, so scoring below 100 percent is normal. Use grading to learn what blocked progress, not to punish teams, or the next cycle will feature safe, unambitious goals.

Frequently asked questions

What is the best OKR software?

Lattice suits HR-led goal programmes, Betterworks suits enterprises, and Weekdone and Mooncamp suit smaller teams wanting simplicity. Profit.co and Quantive suit larger organisations needing analytics.

Is there free OKR software?

Weekdone and several tools offer free tiers or trials for small teams, though user limits apply. Larger teams and advanced analytics usually need paid plans.

What does OKR stand for?

OKR stands for Objectives and Key Results, a goal-setting method where an objective states what you want to achieve and key results measure progress toward it. It is popular in tech and growing companies.

How many OKRs should a team set?

Most teams do best with three to five objectives per quarter, each with a few key results. More goals dilute focus, while fewer goals risk missing important areas.

Do OKR tools integrate with other software?

Yes, most tools here integrate with Slack, Teams, Jira and HR systems, bringing goal updates into daily workflows. Check your stack compatibility before choosing.

Sources

  1. https://lattice.com
  2. https://www.betterworks.com
  3. https://weekdone.com
  4. https://www.perdoo.com
  5. https://quantive.com
  6. https://www.profit.co
  7. https://www.mooncamp.com
  8. https://www.microsoft.com